Skip to content

Text-only Version

Home
In the News
Research Resources
Teaching Resources
Student Resources
Links
The Gallery
Staff

Information as a Commodity:

Control and Benefit Are Morally Owed to the Source

Richard A. Wright

The “High Cost to Industry” Defense

The single most common defense raised by businesses against any proposed reform is that it will cost too much. In fact, the de rigueur argument, no matter what the proposal, seems to be as follows: “All increasers of the cost of doing business are unacceptable; All reforms of business practices proposed from outside are increasers of the cost of doing business; Therefore, All reforms of business practices proposed from outside are unacceptable.” It is thus not surprising that information industry representatives moan loudly about any possible reforms in their practices. This is especially so when those reforms suggest reimbursing information sources for utilizing information about themselves.

To fully understand what is at issue here, we need to compare the information industry to other industries on two counts: first, the industry’s need for “raw materials” in order to operate; and, second, the normal industry recognition that the supplier controls that which s/he supplies.

Back to the top

Go to: 3.1 Raw Materials as a Cost of Doing Business

Home > Research Resources > Computing and Privacy > Information as a Commodity


   

HOME | IN THE NEWS | RESEARCH RESOURCES
TEACHING RESOURCES | STUDENT RESOURCES
LINKS | THE GALLERY | STAFF

The Research Center on Computing & Society
at Southern Connecticut State University
501 Crescent Street • New Haven, CT 06515
Director: (203) 392-6790 • e-mail: webmaster@computerethics.org

© 2000 – 2007 – Research Center on Computing & Society