Skip to content

Text-only Version

Home
In the News
Research Resources
Teaching Resources
Student Resources
Links
The Gallery
Staff

A Plea for Casual Copying

Helen Nissenbaum

6. Conclusion

I have suggested that Johnson’s characterizing the existing system of software laws as relatively just is no more accurate than characterizing a system of laws relatively just that did not discriminate between killing in self-defense, and murder. Why? Because there are good reasons for viewing casual copying as morally justified copying, having to do with the enhancement of important social values.

While I do not question the moral basis for private ownership of software, I propose that we extend the base from which we deduce the bundle of rights that are properly accorded to software owners. In particular, in the case of casual copying, because it is done in fulfillment of perceived obligations to help, or to act responsibly to the needs of others close by, and because it does not significantly threaten the underlying goals of intellectual ownership, it should not be outlawed.

Princeton University

Back to the top

Go to: The Ownership of Ideas in Computer Software – Snapper

Home > Research Resources > Software Ownership & Intellectual Property Rights > A Plea for Casual Copying


   

HOME | IN THE NEWS | RESEARCH RESOURCES
TEACHING RESOURCES | STUDENT RESOURCES
LINKS | THE GALLERY | STAFF

The Research Center on Computing & Society
at Southern Connecticut State University
501 Crescent Street • New Haven, CT 06515
Director: (203) 392-6790 • e-mail: webmaster@computerethics.org

© 2000 – 2007 – Research Center on Computing & Society