The Ethics of Evaluating Instructional Computing

Marvin J. Croy

• Introduction
• 1. Moor’s Analysis
• 2. Overall’s Analysis
• 3. Considerations of these Analyses
• 3.1 Equal Educational Opportunity
• 3.2 Optimum Instruction
• 3.3 Informed Consent and Student Obligation
• 4. Minimizing the Risks to Students
• 5. Summation
• End Notes
• References

References

L. Burkholder, (1992) “Computer Ethics on Campus,” in Terrell Ward Bynum, Walter Maner and John L. Fodor, eds., Computer Ethics Issues in Academic Computing, Research Center on Computing & Society. (This volume, pp. 1 – 12 above.)

M. Croy, (1991). “Integrating CAI Development and Empirical Research: Opportunities and Responsibilities,” Computerized Logic Teaching Bulletin, Volume 4, pp. 2 – 12.

D. Glaskow, C. Sadowski and S. Davis, (1977) “The Project Must Count: Fostering Positive Attitudes Toward the Conduct of Research,” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Volume 10, pp. 471 – 474.

J. Moor, (1986) “Computer-Assisted Instruction and the Guinea Pig Dilemma,” Teaching Philosophy, Volume 9, pp. 351 – 354.

C. Overall, (1986) “Innovation and Injustice,” Teaching Philosophy, Volume 9, pp. 354 – 358.

K. Strike and J. Soltis, (1985) The Ethics of Teaching, Teachers College Press.

U.S. Government, (1991) Federal Register, Vol. 56, No. 117, June 18.

Back to the top

Go to: Some Effects of Computer Technology on Human Interaction and Individualization in the Teaching of Deductive Logic

Home > Teaching Resources > Computer Ethics Issues in Academic Computing > The Ethics of Evaluating Instructional Computing

HOME | IN THE NEWS | RESEARCH RESOURCES
TEACHING RESOURCES | STUDENT RESOURCES
LINKS | THE GALLERY | STAFF

The Research Center on Computing & Society
at Southern Connecticut State University
501 Crescent Street • New Haven, CT 06515
Director: (203) 392-6790 • e-mail: webmaster@computerethics.org

© 2000 – 2007 – Research Center on Computing & Society