Appendix
National Conference on Computing and Values
Report on the Track: Policy Issues in Campus Computing
Report on the Discussions of the Working Group
on Policy Issues in Campus Computing
Marvin J. Croy
1. Problems related to Ethical Issues
As previously stated, the issues which dominated the discussions
of this working group were related either directly or indirectly to the formulation
of an ethical code for computer use on campus. The issues included were wide-ranging,
and presenting a list of those issues here would do little to represent their
complex interactions. Fortunately, Richard Gordon has supplied an overview of
many of these issues in his description of a set of guidelines currently being
considered at the University of Delaware. His commentary addresses the question
of what aims such policies and guidelines should serve and is included above
on pages 33 – 47 as an addendum to this report. The working group’s
discussions made it clear that having a coherent framework for making ethically
related decisions about what constitutes appropriate or inappropriate behavior
is a demanding task. It requires the ability to make values explicit and to
specify what counts as serving them in particular contexts. It requires a sensitivity
to the rights and concerns of a variety of individuals and groups. Asking the
questions “at whom is the policy aimed” and “whom is the policy
supposed to protect” often is given different answers by different parties
on campus. Attempting to provide equity of access to computer resources, for
example, may unearth conflicts which may require the establishment of priorities.
Readers interested in these topics should consult Richard Gordon’s document
directly.
Some problems associated with the use of computers
on campus transcend the physical boundaries of colleges and universities.
Many educational institutions are connected to computer networks such
as BITNET or INTERNET. These networks support electronic mail and list
servers for the discussion of a variety of topics. The problems of confidentiality
associated with electronic mail are perhaps obvious given its similarity
to paper mail. However, there are a number of questions that plague the
use and management of these electronic discussions. One problem, suggested
by Tim Foley, concerns the lack of consistency among the regulations governing
the discussions or networks which are linked together. “There are
different policies for using BITNET, EARN, and NSFNET. Political and religious
activism is forbidden on EARN and the definition of activism could easily
be construed as limiting one’s constitutional rights. Work needs
to be done on some sort of standard policy with some basic concepts of
ethical behavior. It appears that restrictions on types of information
should be implemented at local sites rather than worrying about things
such as political activism or religious activism going across backbone
connections.” Of course, the question of what sort of restrictions
should apply to public postings on networks comes to a head in the example
of the “Love Slave” advertisement presented in Leslie Burkholder’s
conference track address. In the next section, more will be said about
how these cases lead to questions of ethical principles and their application.
It should be clear at this point, however, that the diversity in purpose
and scope of various networks produces problems in respect to their regulation,
problems which are compounded by bridges which connect these networks.
Go to: 2. Research into Ethical Issues of Computing
Home > Teaching Resources > Computer Ethics Issues in Academic Computing > Appendix
HOME | IN
THE NEWS | RESEARCH
RESOURCES
TEACHING RESOURCES | STUDENT
RESOURCES | LINKS
The Research Center on Computing & Society
at Southern Connecticut State University
501 Crescent Street | New Haven, CT 06515
Director: (203) 392-6790 | e-mail: webmaster@computerethics.org
© 2000 – 2004 – Research Center on Computing & Society