DIFFERENT STROKES
BY
TONI-ANN A. BREEN
Southern Connecticut State University
The following case involves a middle school
situated in a large town and encompasses issues
that affect the students, faculty, and administration.
Most directly, it could be utilized by administration
and faculty professionals, implemented as part of a
professional development program or as a
teacher/administration education class. In both
situations, emphasizing the importance of
perspectives would be especially beneficial. As
teachers and administrators examine the different
perspectives at work here, and imbed their own
perspectives and backgrounds into their analysis,
much can be learned. The administration and
faculty from schools of different levels of cultural
diversity would add different outlooks to the case.
Teachers with less exposure to the problems of
racism and discipline would have an opportunity to
step, figuratively at least, outside their comfort
zones. By taking a serious look at the perspectives
of teachers, as well as students, who are faced with
it regularly, teachers of limited experience with
these issues can obtain a larger sense of what is
happening in education. With knowledge comes
power, to solve problems and to make changes. So
as their neighborhoods grow and change, the
knowledge and understanding that teachers might
gain from a case such as this will guide them in
their decisions, helping to effect solutions that can
make a real difference. Similarly, teachers from
more culturally diverse schools, involving constant,
intense racial and disciplinary situations, could
offer tremendous insight into solutions. Their own
expertise and perspectives would be invaluable to
the analysis.
Mainstreaming is also a prominent issue in many
schools today. In this case, it is intertwined with
problems of legal compliance, communication, and
discipline. The case provides an opportunity for
faculty and administration to look at the
perspectives of parents with special needs children.
Parents play a bigger role than ever before in the
education of their children, and are well versed in
the law that governs their situation. With that, as
seen here, comes a need not only for legal
compliance, but understanding on the part of the
administration and faculty. It is in this way that this
case can become an excellent teaching tool. An
analysis of the case forces a need for knowledge.
As in dealing with inclusion, an understanding of
IEP's and the law in general, is mandatory.
Without it, suggestion for action is not possible.
Many different avenues can be followed to access
information regarding Special Education, on the
Internet (www.cec.sped.org) and off. In addition,
case analysis discussions with special education
teachers and regular education teachers involved
with mainstreamed special needs students will
provide invaluable insight.
Some questions for the participants involved in this
case analysis are:
1.) Is the school's Zero Tolerance discipline policy
appropriate in a case of racial harassment?, and if
not, develop a new policy for this school and
implement it in the Kevin Smith situation.
2.) As assistant principal, how would you handle
the situation with Kevin Smith?
3.) What message is Brent Mulder trying to send
with his zero-tolerance policy?
4.) What message is being received...by
students?...by parents?...by teachers?
5.) What else can Brent Mulder do to most
effectively get his message to students and
teachers?
6.) How should, with respect to the law, the school
proceed with mainstreaming?
7.) What role should Amy Brown, Special
Education Director, play in the mainstreaming
process?
8.) What should Brent's role be?
9.) Does the discrepancy in discipline between John
Stafford, a regular education student, and Michael
O'Neil, discredit the school's disciplinary policy?
10.) Is it fair for there to be a discrepancy in
discipline between those two students?
11.)What is the next most effective action that
should be made with Michael O'Neil?
12.) What is the best possible program change that
can be made for Michael O'Neil?
13.)What will Brent Mulder say to Mr. Stafford
and why?
14.)What is Deborah Morton's perspective on
mainstreaming in general?
15.)Are Deborah Morton's feelings regarding
special ed students and the regular ed curriculum
justified?
16.)Will Mainstreaming pose a problem for Lisa
Betts's interdisciplinary unit?... if so, how can
these problems be handled?
17.)What would Mrs. Tomanelli say about the
possibility of rewriting her son's IEP to exclude
mainstreaming?
18.)What would Mrs. Tomanelli's perspective be
on Deborah Morton's views concerning
mainstreaming?
19.)What part can or should the Guidance
department play in each of the issues involved in
the case?
Although not written specifically as a case for
students, some segments could be expanded on
expressly for that purpose. The racial and
disciplinary incidents involving the students are all
true and could be written and implemented as part
of a peer mediation program. Students reading the
case might work in groups to brainstorm ways that
a peer mediation program could help handle similar
problems. It would give them an opportunity to
take on the perspective of a peer who is being
harassed, as well as the faculty responsible for
dealing with the problem. Ask them: If it were you,
how could you best handle the humiliation and
anger that would accompany racial harassment?
What is the best thing students can do to bring
about positive change in a school facing these
situations? What do you think is the most important
thing that an administrator could do to send
appropriate messages to all students engaging in
violent situations? Have them set up three methods
of dealing with peer conflict within their own
mediation program. Have them spend a day in a
more culturally diverse school setting. The learning
opportunities are immense.
DIFFERENT STROKES
SCENE 1 -The First Day of School
It was the first day of the school year and as always
Brent Mulder arrived early. He was looking
forward to beginning his third year as assistant
principal at Wilberton Middle School and was
pleased with his most recent accomplishment. After
the school's other assistant principal left earlier in
the summer, it became Brent's job to handle all of
the scheduling. With no prior experience in
scheduling, he had to assign 1002 students in
seventh and eighth grade to appropriate courses and
teachers. The master schedule was to remain the
same, and gave Brent the framework necessary to
implement the new schedule. However, prior to
this year, the schedule had been done completely by
hand, something he had hoped to have an
opportunity to change since he started at Wilberton
Middle School two years ago. It meant canceling
his family's summer vacation, but his hard work
paid off. Brent completed the scheduling and felt it
was now up to speed with the automated twentieth
century. Despite the accomplishment however, he
definitely looked forward to relinquishing this duty
to the new assistant principal, just hired this week.
As the students finally began to file in, scheduling
was far from first on his mind. He wondered what
new challenges the students themselves might hold.
Wilberton is a large town, encompassing all ranges
of the socio-economic and racial scale. Students
enter this one middle school from a conglomerate of
nine elementary schools, made up of students from
nine different neighborhoods. Some border one of
the most expensive areas in the state in which to
live, while others are located on the line of the
lowest socio-economic area of one of the state's
largest and most racially diverse inner cities. In the
past, the students had weathered these differences
quite well. It was often the parents who had
problems dealing with the differences and Brent
hoped that this year would show improved
tolerance amongst all people involved. As he
watched the students enter the school, he recalled
some of the past problems.
One most trying case he dealt with last year was the
protection of a boy named Kevin Smith. He was
termed a "skin-head" by most students at the school
and his life was threatened regularly. His father
explained that Kevin's haircut, or lack there of, was
due to a skin condition and nothing more. To
complicate matters, however, Kevin regularly
taunted all students of a different color and/or
religion with racial and religious slurs, enraging
those students and sending tempers flying. Each
time this happened, Brent was responsible for
implementing discipline. Per order of the school
disciplinary code, any and all students involved in
physical violence were punished. Kevin would
deny any wrong doing and it was ultimately the
other students who felt the brunt of the discipline.
Wilberton Middle School employs a zero tolerance
discipline policy, which implements the fullest
possible extent of discipline by law: ten days
suspension for any display of physical violence, a
policy Brent fully endorses.
The policy also encompasses discipline for
harassment: five days suspension for verbal
provocation of violence. Brent is thankful for this
clause, as it helps to keep the discipline policies a
little more fair to those students on the receiving
end of the harassment, particularly in the case of
Kevin. It is difficult to prove, however. Brent
would do his best to question all students in these
situations, with hopes that the truth would come
forth, but it was extremely time consuming and not
always fruitful. In these types of situation,
however, it was all he had.
SCENE 2 - Mainstreaming?
Two weeks into school, things were relatively
quiet. No major disciplinary problems had surfaced
and Brent contentedly watched the students file
through the halls at the end of the day. He was
thinking that the peer mediation program that he had
implemented a year and a half ago to help curb
some of these problems might actually be working.
It was a completely "blind" program that allowed
for teachers and students to enter the names of any
group of people felt to be in conflict, with total
anonymity. The peer mediators were especially
enthusiastic this year and seemed highly committed.
The program had been used twice already since the
start of school, and worked very well. There were
two relatively small problems involving female
students, but Brent was especially impressed with
how quickly all parties got into the flow of
procedures. He was hopeful that students would
continue to look for alternative ways to solve
problems that might easily result in violence.
His feeling of contentment faded as he was
approached by Nancy McCann, one of the two
Special Education teachers at the school. Although
the issue at hand was not at all discipline related, it
was a major problem that would most likely take
extensive time to repair.
"I have a parent who doesn't seem exactly happy
with the placement of her son," she said. Brent,
curious and ready to help handle the problem
asked, "What's up?" He was somewhat bewildered
and shocked by the answer.
"She said her son's IEP calls for mainstreaming in
the areas of Art, Music, Physical Education and
Health, and that's not what she thinks is
happening."
"Well, what is happening?" asked Brent. "Is he
being mainstreamed or not?"
Nancy briefly explained, "All of the special needs
students are being mainstreamed into classes being
taught by regular education teachers, but are not
being included into classes with regular education
students." She handed Brent the note that
Mrs.Tomanelli had written with regard to her son
Jason. Brent took the note and went back to his
office. He was thinking about Nancy's comment
concerning mainstreaming. How could a child be
considered mainstreamed at all if there were no
regular education students included in the class?
Furthermore, he wondered how much
responsibility rested on the shoulders of the person
who handled the scheduling.
SCENE 3 -Verbal Harassment VS.
Physical Violence
A commotion just outside the entrance where the
school busses picked up the students caught the
attention of Brent and a few other teachers both
inside and outside the school. All faculty members
in the area rushed to the scene to find two boys on
top of someone thrashing violently and screaming
profanities. One of the boys was white and one was
black. As the teachers pried the boys away, the
situation became a little clearer. It had been seen
before. Kevin Smith and another white male who
had recently shaved his head as well were
underneath the other two boys. They looked a little
worse for wear, but not badly hurt. The teachers
had arrived on the scene almost immediately.
One of the boys who was fighting started
screaming. "We didn't start it. Those two racist,
skinheads called me a nigger."
"We did not. You're the racist! You figure since
we've shaved our heads, we're part of the KKK!
We didn't do anything."
"Let's go," said Brent as he led the two fighters to
his office. He left Kevin and his friend for the
principal to deal with. She had just arrived on the
scene. As he walked away he heard one of the
teachers muttering... "once again Kevin Smith
would get off scott free in honor of our wonderful
disciplinary policy."
"Someone needs to think seriously about changing
that," was the response from another teacher. Brent
stayed focussed on the matter at hand and continued
to the office with the two students.
SCENE 4 - Damage Control
Brent groaned as he hung up the phone. He had
been speaking with Amy Brown, the Special
Education Director of Secondary Schools in
Wilberton. He had the utmost respect for Amy.
Still, he could not help wondering how this
situation could have carried on for so long. It
seemed that the entire Special Education department
was content to explain the mainstreaming part of the
IEP of all self-contained special needs students in a
way that is inconsistent with the law. They defined
mainstreaming as an inclusion of these students into
regular education classes, defined specifically by
the credentials of the teachers teaching a particular
class, and gave no consideration to the inclusion of
typical peers. He was thinking about
least-restrictive environments, but couldn't quite
understand why no-one else had.
At this point, the most important thing to do was to
comply with the law. At least one parent, Mrs.
Tomanelli, was aware of the situation, as well as
the rights of her son. Amy Brown had explained
that all of the sixteen self-contained special needs
students had IEP's requiring mainstreaming into
Art, Health, Music, and Physical Education,
therefore, all students and their parents in this
situation needed to be accommodated. As the
"scheduler," he needed to make it
happen...immediately!
Briefly reviewing the schedule, he realized that
combining all classes with regular and special needs
students would actually reduce class size, a definite
plus for students and teachers. He would need to
prep both students and teachers as to what would
be happening. He thought the students could
probably understand it best from a class size
perspective, while the teachers would be briefed on
the whole picture--compliance with the law being
the number one priority. He figured it would be the
students who were hardest to convince. Change is
always difficult for kids, and from the looks of
things at least ten regular education students would
need to be moved in each class. He wondered how
the teachers would handle all the different
modifications required for these special needs kids,
and how it might interfere with the regular ed kids.
Furthermore, he hoped that they would remain
aware of them. He knew it would be imperative that
the special ed teachers as well as the regular ed
teachers would come together as a team in order for
this to work for everyone, but was not entirely
convinced that would happen.
Over the next two weeks Brent spent most of his
personal time working on the schedule and devoted
his school time to the Kevin Smith incident. He
spoke with about twenty students who might have
seen or heard what started the fight between Kevin
Smith and the other boys. No one had anything
very concrete to offer. It was becoming evident,
however, that it was not only the teachers who
were concerned about the deliverance of justice in
cases like these. Enough of the students were
verbal enough for Brent to get the picture. He
remained firm in his position on the issue -- "There
is no tolerance for violence and there is always
another way to handle a problem, one possibility
being the peer mediation program."
He also spent time talking with Kevin and his
friend about what they did to provoke the problem.
They both denied any harassment and maintained
that there was prejudice against them because of the
way they cut their hair.
"We have a right to shave our heads and believe
what we want. This is their problem," said Kevin
with a tone of arrogance and disgust.
Brent suggested talking with one of the guidance
counselors or social workers, but knew that it
would never come to fruition. If Kevin didn't seek
them out, Brent knew the counselors would not
seek Kevin out. He had also, in the past, suggested
to Kevin's father that they seek some kind of
counseling outside the school for Kevin's behavior,
but Mr. Smith had held fast to the idea that Kevin's
hair cut was due to a skin condition and his racism
was a figment of the administration's imagination.
SCENE 5 - Mainstreaming!
When Brent finished the new schedule he held a
meeting to brief the teachers involved in the
mainstreaming situation. All of the regular
education teachers as well as the two special
education teachers were present. The purpose of the
meeting was to explain what the scheduling
changes were and why it was being done.
Previously in each of the affected disciplines, Art,
Music, Physical Education, and Health, three
regular education teachers had taught about thirty
regular education students each, and two had taught
eight special needs students each, during the same
period. Brent randomly assigned the sixteen special
ed students to the five different teachers involved
within each discipline. Now four of the five
classrooms would include three special needs
students and the fifth classroom included four. In
each of the disciplines, the fifth classroom was
taught by one of the regular ed teachers previously
responsible for teaching the special ed students. He
felt this made the most sense since it was those
teachers that were most familiar with teaching
special needs kids. He then randomly chose and
assigned twelve regular education students from
each of the three original "regular education"
classrooms to the two original "special ed
mainstreamed" classrooms. This resulted in a
decreased class size for the three original regular ed
classes, and although it increased the size of the
other two classes, it cut the number of special needs
students tremendously. He had moved about 208
students in all, and was comfortable with the
results. He thought that some of the students might
object to a change in teacher, or being separated
from friends, but the teachers were getting much
smaller classes, which would be a positive change
for everyone.
After briefly explaining the law and Wilberton's
lack of compliance with it, he gave each teacher
their new class roster. He expounded on the
benefits of smaller class size and waited for their
acknowledgment as well as their agreement.
"Are there any questions?" he asked.
Most teachers responded with some basic, but very
important questions concerning their responsibility
for teaching their newly acquired special needs
students, questions that Brent welcomed. He had
hoped that they would show concern for these
matters and thus, do whatever it would take to best
handle their new situations. He introduced them all
to the two special education teachers also present at
the meeting, and explained that they could help with
any information the regular ed teachers may need.
He also suggested that the two regular education
teachers from each discipline previously
responsible for teaching all of the special needs
students could also be a wealth of knowledge. They
had been teaching these students for a month now
and had been responsible for all "mainstreamed"
special needs students for years.
Deborah Morton, the health teacher who had
traditionally taught the eight special needs students,
responded with a different concern.
"The real problem here is that the special needs kids
can't handle the standard curriculum, and putting
them in regular classes like that is setting them up
for failure. What are the parents going to say when
their kids suddenly can't make it through a health
class that they have had no trouble with until now?"
Brent replied by emphasizing the need for legal
compliance. "Right now our main focus needs to be
getting us on track with the law. Change is difficult
for everyone, but we really have no choice in the
matter. Each of you will need to take appropriate
steps to make this situation work best, not just for
you but for all of the students."
Lisa Betts, a physical education teacher, spoke up
at this point. "What about the interdisciplinary unit
we were supposed to start with the science
departments?" she asked. Lisa was the person who
had designed the unit, and was extremely
enthusiastic about it. She called it "The Human
Body--Fitness and Health". It was the first time that
the Phys.Ed. department had ever been involved in
an interdisciplinary unit. The science teachers had
entered the project with great enthusiasm as well.
"We're supposed to start on Monday, but I have no
idea how the special needs kids will fit into this?
Am I supposed to put everything on hold now? The
students are looking forward to it too."
Deborah Morton was also involved in an
interdisciplinary unit. "The health department is
doing an interdisciplinary unit with the foreign
language department. Do the special needs kids
even take a foreign language?"
"Oh come on, Deborah. Foreign Languages is
using our lessons to develop their dialogues and
vocabulary lists. It will hardly interfere with that,"
said Tom Hudson, another health teacher at the
meeting.
Things were getting much louder than Brent had
anticipated. "Again," said Brent, "you can talk to
the special ed teachers about these concerns. It may
turn out that nothing has to change and everything
can remain on course. If changes do need to be
made, then that's just the way it is. We really have
no other options."
The meeting continued for a short time. Brent
answered some more questions, while Deborah
Morton, the health teacher, sat shaking her head.
Brent was getting used to this kind of response
from Deborah. He knew that she had also applied
for the assistant principal position when he did, and
felt that her attitude toward him was much more
personally driven than professionally. He
adjourned the meeting without further comment to
her, and the teachers went home.
The following day they explained the schedule
change to the students. It was explained in terms of
class size and the best option for learning and
teaching. Each of the students had a letter of
explanation to take home to their parents. Brent
hoped for the best.
SCENE 6 - OOPS!
Before settling in at his desk, Gary Armstrong, one
of Wilberton's guidance counselors, checked the
peer mediation box located just inside the guidance
office doorway. He and one of the school's social
workers were responsible for facilitating and
monitoring the program. Teachers, administrators,
and students alike could submit a peer mediation
form completely anonymously into the peer
mediation box. The form simply provides a space
for names of people thought to be in conflict. It is
not necessary to know who submits the form or
why. Upon receiving a form, Gary calls in two
peer mediators as well as those students listed on
the form. The peer mediators are students who have
applied for the opportunity and been accepted
through a rigorous process. Gary and Bonnie, the
school's social worker, sit outside the mediation
room while the parties talk things out. They enter
the room only if they feel someone is in danger or if
they are asked. The program was fairly new, but
Gary felt it was time and effort well spent. Usually
Gary and Bonnie were the only faculty or
administration ever involved in the mediation
processes. As he read the names on the form this
morning, however, Gary knew this would be
different. One name on the form was that of a
seventh grade regular education student. The other,
Michael O'Neil, was a special needs student. He
had come to the school after spending the previous
year in a self-contained residential education
program. He was one of the special education
students recently mainstreamed, and Gary thought
that, until now, he had never been schooled in a
regular education classroom. In addition, there had
never been a peer mediation incident involving a
special needs and regular education student. He
was unclear how to proceed in this situation, so he
called the peer mediation expert, Brent Mulder.
Brent had spent a bit of time last week over a matter
concerning this very same student. Michael O'Neil
had thrown a heavy metal lock out the window of
the bus on the way home from school one day. The
lock hit the windshield of a car that had been
traveling behind the bus and shattered it. The driver
of the car identified Michael, as did nine students
present on the bus, as the culprit. Brent was still at
school when this happened and upon hearing of the
incident, immediately began his suspension
procedures. He spoke with Michael's parents that
evening, explaining the incident as well as the
school's discipline policy. The following day
Michael had remained at home. Late in the day,
however, Amy Brown informed Brent that this was
not acceptable for a special needs student, and
Michael's IEP specifically called for no more than a
three day in school suspension, with a total of no
more than ten suspension days over the course of a
year. A hearing needed to be held to determine if
the incident was due to his disability (Seriously
Emotionally Disabled), and if so, appropriate
measures called for a change in his program. The
change that Amy Brown suggested was that he not
be allowed to ride the bus home from school. It
was agreed that he should not be barred from riding
the bus entirely, because that would isolate him too
much from his peers. Although Brent had no other
recourse in the situation, he found himself groping
for the rationale behind the decision. It went against
the zero-tolerance policy, and his unconditional
belief in it.
After speaking with Gary Armstrong he was
concerned about what might be coming next. He
advised Gary to go ahead with the program in the
usual manner. Since no-one in the mediation
program would be wielding punishment, there was
no danger in overstepping the IEP guidelines. He
couldn't stop wondering what the conflict was
really about and hoped it would amount to nothing.
Until now, the new mainstreaming schedule had
yielded no other problems.
When the phone rang again, it was Amy Brown,
not with information about Michael O'Neil,
however, with a suggestion for handling the
mainstreaming situation. She had had many
conversations with Deborah Morton since the new
mainstreaming program was implemented. Deborah
was dead set against the idea, and seemed
genuinely concerned for the education of the special
needs students. Although no other problems had
been reported in the two weeks that had passed,
Deborah struck a nerve with Amy. "Brent, I really
think that the best possible course of action with
regard to mainstreaming might be to rewrite the
IEP's. Deborah has been teaching health to the
special needs students for six years, and I really
feel that she may be right about their inability to
function within the regular curriculum...and based
on the situation with Michael O'Neil, I think maybe
these kids just aren't up to this challenge."
Brent was speechless. He could not believe what he
was hearing. When he first learned of the school's
ignorance of the law, he was shocked and handled
the problem in the best possible way that he could.
He finally responded to Amy with the only question
he could manage. "What about the law?" he asked.
"As long as we abide by the students' IEP's, we're
OK," Amy said. So, what do you think?"
"I will not do it, Amy," he answered. "I worked
like crazy to make things right based on the
information I got from you. I believe that this is the
way things should be. If you disagree, you need to
handle the situation yourself, or have someone else
do it."
"Well," Amy said, "I'm not set on what to do at
this point. I just thought that I would bounce this
idea off you. How is everything else going?"
Brent cringed. This was probably the last thing he
wanted to tell, Amy. "Michael O'Neil and another
student were requested for peer mediation. I have
no idea what the conflict is but I'll stay on top of
it." He hung up the phone, and took a walk through
Wilberton's halls.
SCENE 7 - Double Standards
Tom Hudson, one of the health teachers, had just
walked into his classroom. He usually would take
about a minute to let the class settle itself down,
before he began his lesson. As he walked over to
the chalkboard he heard one of the students yell.
"Hey, knock it off O'Neil." It was John Stafford,
and he was yelling at Michael O'Neil. "I know it
was you, so knock it off!" he screamed. Tom had
never had a problem with John before, and he was
surprised to see him yelling like that.
"OK, OK," Tom said. "What's going on over
here?"
"He threw a pencil at me, Mr. Hudson. I know it
was him, because he called my name right before it
hit me. He's a trouble maker," said John.
Tom was able to calm the boys, as well as the rest
of the class, down enough to get through the next
45 minutes, but when the bell rang to signal the end
of the period, Michael charged through the room,
and pushed John Stafford from behind. John stood
up, ran at Michael and began hitting him. Tom
Hudson was able to break up the fight within a
minute or so. Neither of the boys seemed hurt, but
John was still ready to fight. "I'm sick of it! He's
always pushing me and tripping me. I can't stand
him!" John was still yelling and Mr. Hudson had to
hold him back.
Another teacher came in and cleared the classroom.
The two teachers escorted the boys down to the
office and met Brent along the way. Tom told him
the story as they walked back to the office. He left
Michael O'Neil with Gary Armstrong in the
guidance department and asked him to call Amy
Brown. He needed to know what the appropriate
action for Michael should be. Nothing was left to
question. Tom Hudson had seen the whole thing.
"Michael pushed John to the limit, Brent. I watched
the whole thing." Once John was out of earshot,
inside Brent's office, Tom made his feelings
obvious. "John is a good kid, and doesn't deserve
to have to put up with that."
"It doesn't matter why he hit him Tom," said Brent.
"What matters is that he learns there are other
alternatives. Fighting is wrong....Period!"
"Well Michael was also physical, Brent. Just make
sure he gets what's coming to him as well." It was
important to Tom to stress this point. He liked John
and felt badly about him getting in trouble in light
of the circumstances.
Brent returned to his office to handle the ten day
suspension procedure for John Stafford. He had
every intention of also punishing Michael O'Neil.
The problem was that he knew without a doubt that
Michael's punishment would not be close to that of
John Stafford.
SCENE 8
Mr. Stafford waited in the school's office for Brent
to arrive. His son, John, had started his ten day
suspension three days ago. Mr. Stafford had since
learned that the other boy was not suspended at all,
and from what he had heard about the fight, this
was unfair and unacceptable. When Brent arrived,
the secretary introduced the two men.
"I'd like to talk to you about John, Mr. Mulder. I'm
a little upset about what's going on here," Mr.
Stafford said when they were done shaking hands.
"Sure," said Brent, "Come into my office." Brent
led Mr. Stafford to his office and offered him a
seat. He closed the door and they talked.