Interpretation # 10
| Points:
|
all dots on a sheet of paper.
|
![]() |
| Lines:
|
all horizontal and vertical lines. |
|
| Incidence:
|
PIl if the dot P lies on the line l. |
QUESTIONS:
Does this interpretation satisfy the incidence axiom I-1?
Does this interpretation satisfy the incidence axiom I-2?
Does this interpretation satisfy the incidence axiom I-3?
Is this interpretation a model?
Determine whether this interpretation has the elliptic, Euclidean, of hyperbolic parallel property.
ANSWERS:
Does this interpretation satisfy the incidence axiom I-1?
No, there is no line through A and B in the figure. (the existence part of axiom I-1 is not satisfied)
Does this interpretation satisfy the incidence axiom I-2?
Yes, every line in this interpretation has infinitely many points, therefore at least two.
Does this interpretation satisfy the incidence axiom I-3?
Yes, points A, B, and C in the figure are distinct and non-collinear.
Is this interpretation a model?
No, the incidence axiom I-1 is not satisfied.
Determine whether this interpretation has the elliptic, Euclidean, of hyperbolic parallel property.
This interpretation has the Euclidean parallel property. For every horizontal (vertical) line, and point P that is not on the line, there is a unique horizontal (respectively vertical) line through P. Obviously two horizontal (vertical) lines are parallel.