Interpretation # 9
| Points:
|
A, B, C, D, and E.
|
![]() |
| Lines:
|
{A, B}, {A, C}, {A, D}, {A, E}, {B,C}, {B, D} {B, E},{C, D}, {C, E}, and {D, E}. |
|
| Incidence:
|
PIl if P is an element of l. |
QUESTIONS:
Does this interpretation satisfy the incidence axiom I-1?
Does this interpretation satisfy the incidence axiom I-2?
Does this interpretation satisfy the incidence axiom I-3?
Is this interpretation a model?
Determine whether this interpretation has the elliptic, Euclidean, of hyperbolic parallel property.
ANSWERS:
Does this interpretation satisfy the incidence axiom I-1?
Yes, if P and Q are any of the letters A, B, C, D and E, {P, Q} is the unique line in which they both lie.
Does this interpretation satisfy the incidence axiom I-2?
Yes, every line in this interpretation has exactly two points, therefore at least two.
Does this interpretation satisfy the incidence axiom I-3?
Yes, points A, B, and C are distinct and non-collinear.
Is this interpretation a model?
Yes, all three incidence axioms I-1, I-2, and I-3 are satisfied.
Determine whether this interpretation has the elliptic, Euclidean, of hyperbolic parallel property.
This interpretation has the hyperbolic parallel property, because for any line {P, Q}, and any point R that is not on {P, Q} (therefore R is different from P and Q), there exist two lines {R, S}, and {R, T} through R and parallel to {P, Q}. ( S , and T are points that the sets {A, B, C, D, E} and {P, Q, R, S, T} are the same). For example there exist two lines that go through A and are parallel to the line {B, D} (lines {A, C}, and {A, E})